Caramel Copyright And Creative Commons Trail Mix
It is difficult to talk about copyrighting one’s blog without sounding a bit hoity-toity. Well, let me rephrase that. It is difficult to talk about copyrighting my blog without sounding hoity-toity.
Before reading the next paragraph, pop over to the linguistics center of your brain, and conjure a sophisticated Dame Judy Dench or Dr. Frasier Crane accent. Now use this accent to read the following:
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from the author, including, but not limited to, placenta fun, bouncy ball catastrophes, crotch-licking cats, dorks writing on treadmills, diaper-crapping man babies, KY Jelly sandwiches, sunburned privates, and conversations with Mr. Nasty Pants, is strictly prohibited.
If your mental voice shifted to Larry the Cable Guy, don’t feel bad. I’m sure you are not alone.
And if you noticed the numerous personal plugs inserted into that paragraph, I hope you will revel in your astuteness and keep it to yourself. No need to gossip about my insecure narcissism.
But my point is, do I need to copyright my blog? The thought of anyone burglarizing my written dung seems laughable. In fact, just like a professional athlete, I’m more than happy to spread my seed around. If a copyright symbol took up vigil on my site, would those lovely reblogs be possible? I don’t know about you, but I rather enjoy blog-pollination.
Okay. I hear you. What if my content appears but not the credit, someone masking the material as his or her own? Once past the question of “why the hell would they?”, I need to ask myself, “Would I sue if they did?”
From what I’ve read, litigation is what it comes down to. If you don’t plan to sue, then probably no need for the C in the circle tattoo.
But wait. There’s more.
During my research, nicely accompanied by Caramel Cashew Trail Mix, one tasty morsel per mouse click, I also discovered something called Creative Commons. This is not a place in the Student Union where liberal arts students get naked and recite poetry—I know, I was surprised, too. Rather Creative Commons is a sort of middle ground in the Internet age, a sliding scale of protection, if you will, where some materials may be used without permission of the creator, while others require a “Please, Sir or Madam, can I post your drivel on my blog?”
I found a lovely comparison in an apropos blog post entitled Copyright Vs. Creative Commons. And as a side note, to these and other bloggers who offer helpful advice, thereby creating a more understandable online world, I sincerely thank you.
I, on the other hand, will continue to pollute and debase the medium.
So which trail mix goodie do you choose?
The rigid copyright cashew? The sweeter Creative Commons M&M? Or, like me thus far, the risky and sticky, no-protection, rot-your-teeth, chocolate-covered caramel ball?
But remember, as with every taste-bud pleaser, preferences are subject to change. Indeed, if I start dropping teeth faster than a caveman with an animal hide full of snuff, I may need a little more protection.
How do the rest of you feel? Have you copyrighted your blog? Use Creative Commons? If you share your thoughts with me, I’ll share my trail mix with you.
Oops. Sorry. It’s gone.
Cartoon images from Microsoft Clip Art
* * *
Other helpful resources I found during my high-calorie research:
Is Creative Commons Right for Your Blog
Should You Register Your Blog with the U.S. Copyright Office
Copyright vs. Creative Commons: How Creative Commons licenses compromise your rights
Related articles
- Creative Commons License – Protecting your copyright online (showard76.wordpress.com)
- Copyrighting our Contents: A List of Free Services That Protects Our Works (lifebydmagdalene.wordpress.com)
- Creative Commons Simplified (techfleece.com)







